Big Wide World

i have friday night off, but i found out about it too late, so i have nothing to do. i'm going to share some randomness with you. but be warned. it has nothing to do with anything, its just my thoughts, and i'm REALLY bored.

1. reading the newspaper, i came across a quote stated by Jamie Foxx on what to buy his pal Tom Cruise for a wedding gift (he may not have to). this is what he said: "What do you get a person who has everything? maybe i'll buy him some people or something." (so i tilt my head in question). now i'm thinking first, rich people are nuts and in a world entirely their own, and second, umm, did you just say that you're going to buy a slave for your friend as a gift? i mean, i think that that's what he said (correct me if i'm wrong please). dude, shouldn't you be a little more careful about what you say. i know you're rich, but does that allow you to say any stupid thing now? oh right, i forgot, he won an oscar so he's allowing to do anything.

2. ryan seacrest gets a star on the walk of fame. my only thought-- "what the hell?"
(note to self- star on the walk of fame means nothing anymore)

3. The Canadian Coalition Against the Death Penalty (CCADP, or read tree hugging cry me a river bloody liberalists) gave Scott Perterson (killed his pregnant wife around christmas) a website from death row so that he can now post messages to the public in which he thanked ppl who have written him. isn't this going a little too far? the guy killed his PREGNANT WIFE but we have to give him an outlet to say how the effort ppl have made to write to him in support is incredible and it has made such a difference to him and his family and: "the thoughtfullness and benevolence shown is a source of strength and spirit, an affirmation of considerable community". NO NO NO. whoever writes to murders in jail needs to reconsider what missing in their lives, and murderers are shut behind bars so that we don't have to deal with them, hear them, or see them. but hey, i'm sure that laci's family is very thankful (read NOT).

4. lastly, for today, since some ppl like my comparison, i'm going to share my thought officially. first of all, i have privately banned tom cruise and ANY past or future movie that he makes or is involved in (a little excessive maybe, but i've had enough). and i recently made a discovery. tom cruise IS derek zoolander. no no, go with me on this. derek has the same look for all the different emotions (watch the movie if you haven't), and tom cruise's acting is ALL the SAME. there's no depth, and take away the special effects, the millions and millions of dollars that are helping the movie, and you have zoolander. john waters said it best when asked about what disgusts him: "you know, disgusting to me is stupidity or something that's overproduced and costs too much, with 30 writers, that's just made to make money..." hey tom, you're not so hot, not a good actor, nobody cares, and GET OVER YOURSELF (oh, and it was just water, egomaniac).
tom =
that's my random useless opinions of the day. thanks for reading.