Thursday, November 13, 2008

How do you Think? (Developing A Capacity for Self-Evaluation #1)

What kind of thinker are you? Do you think with your right side of the brain or the left side? Do you even know?

This might not be a huge issue for you, but knowing how you think helps you problem solve, learn and do pretty much anything analytical or academic.

For instance - I know that I'm pathetic at science, history or math. My mind can't think in those terms. But I excel in philosophy, social sciences, humanities in general. For a while, that left me frustrated because not understanding how my brain functions made me just say "I suck at math" and I left it at that. Now, knowing how I think, I can try to focus on thinking in a different way since now I know there is a different way.

I'm not a linear thinker. I think through synthesis. Its a method of solving a problem by looking at the whole and trying to use pattern-matching to solve the problem. More to the point, I'm a chaotic thinker. I look at the whole, then put the pieces together (yeah, always been good at puzzles). This is in contrast to a way of thinking as analysis, in which a problem is solved by breaking it down to its pieces and analyzing the pieces one at a time. This is a linear way of thinking.

I don't understand the linear thought process. But I've seen it at work. Anyone who is good at history is clearly (to me) a linear thinker. And being good at it and liking it are two separate issues.

Now, a quick google search and wiki search starts to suggests some primary ways of starting to figure out whether you think through analysis or synthesis.

There seems to be a suggestion that if you're left handed, you use the right hemisphere of your brain and think through synthesis. If you're right handed, you use the left hemisphere of your brain and you think through analysis. I'm not saying this is exact but there seem to be some suggests of this.

Think about how you multi-task. This is how I know where I fall on the thinking scale. When you mulit-task, do you tend to have a lot of tasks, but do one at a time, or do you have 30 things going at once. Personally, i know i'm a chaotic thinker because I always have lots of little projects, little tasks, and I'm jumping from one to the other. It doesn't bother me that I start something and then have to come back to it. I know some linear thinkers, and if they do this, it drives them crazy. they need to do one thing at a time or they get bewildered. At work, I always have a lot of post-its with random bits of information everywhere. I also have online PIMS and on my Ipod Touch, on my blackberry and on my Nokia. I have bits of information everywhere, but I pretty much always know where it is. Linear thinkers tend to be more composed in their thinking and tend to have information at one location or one primary source.

And I'm not suggesting that you can't be both, or that different situations have led you to adapt to thinking in both terms. We learn and adapt so you could use both methods. I tend to use the one and have difficulties with the other (I can do math, it just takes more effort). This is just a simple introduction to helping you get started in terms of figuring how you think in order to overcome any frustrations that might have come up.

Monday, November 10, 2008

IAT and your level of unconscious prejudice

Very interesting research and study of discovering people's levels of unconscious prejudice.

The IAT, Implicit Associate Test, is an experimental method within social psychology designed to measure the strength of automatic association between mental representations of objects (concepts) in memory. The IAT requires the rapid categorization of various stimulus objects, such that easier pairings (and faster responses) are interpreted as being more strongly associated in memory than more difficult pairings (slower responses).

The Harvard online demo test is a very interesting personal exploration into thoughts that you might not realize you have. As an example, I did the gay/straight test, since I know a lot of gay people. I didn't think I had a preference to either sexual type, but it turns out that I still have a slightly higher preference towards straight people. That was surprising. I truly didn't think I preferred either (well, expect for maybe actually being straight).

There are also tests about age, weight, race, etc. that I think we should all take in order to understand ourselves better. Self evaluation should be a high priority for all of us, so that we can understand ourselves better in the context of our external life.

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?